Notice: Undefined property: stdClass::$image_fulltext in /home/indiancountrynew/public_html/plugins/content/social2s/social2s.php on line 1531

Notice: Undefined property: stdClass::$image_intro in /home/indiancountrynew/public_html/plugins/content/social2s/social2s.php on line 1533

Notice: Undefined property: stdClass::$image_fulltext in /home/indiancountrynew/public_html/plugins/content/social2s/social2s.php on line 1531

Notice: Undefined property: stdClass::$image_intro in /home/indiancountrynew/public_html/plugins/content/social2s/social2s.php on line 1533

Michigan tribes reach proposed deal on fishing, hunting rights

By John Flesher
Traverse City, Michigan (AP)

Five tribes will regulate hunting, fishing and plant gathering by their members on millions of acres in Michigan under a tentative agreement announced during late September with the state.

Supporters hope the proposal will end decades of bickering over what rights Indians retained when they signed away ownership of land that amounts to 37 percent of the state. The 1836 treaty helped lead to Michigan acquiring statehood the next year.

State officials and the leaders of most tribes and sporting groups were lining up behind the plan, saying it doesn’t give the tribes all they want but does protect their interests.

It “will provide stability and predictability in an area of former legal uncertainty,” said Rebecca Humphries, director of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources.

The case dates to 1973, when the federal government sued seeking state recognition of tribal rights under the 1836 treaty.

“If you lived through the ‘70s, all that animosity – it was just a very bad situation,” said Joseph C. Raphael, former chairman of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians. “We all wanted to keep that from happening again. Is everyone going to be satisfied? Absolutely not, but this is something for the good of all.”

The proposed consent decree needs approval of each tribe’s government and U.S. District Judge Richard Enslen to take effect. Several have already signed on, while the largest tribe – the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians – has submitted the pact to its 23,870 adult members for a referendum.

Both sides hope to submit the document to Enslen before the next court hearing, scheduled for Oct. 22.

Conservation and property rights groups that observed the negotiations described the agreement as “tough but fair.”

“We have worked to ensure healthy and sustainable game and fish populations, to protect private property rights and to preserve Michigan’s sportspersons’ heritage,” said Dennis Muchmore, executive director of the Michigan United Conservation Clubs.

In a statement, the Burt Lake Preservation Association voiced “disappointment with the negotiation process because there was little public involvement.” The group said it feared the deal would put the lake’s walleye fishery at risk.

“But we must accept the conclusion and work towards a positive resolution with the state and the tribes,” the association said.

Tribal leaders say they have demonstrated over many generations their responsible stewardship of natural resources.

“We’ve wanted all along to make sure people wouldn’t feel the need to lash out because they were afraid we were going to destroy the resource,” said Jimmie Mitchell, natural resources director for the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians based in Manistee.

The proposal affects much of the western and northern Lower Peninsula and the eastern Upper Peninsula.

The five tribes are the Bay Mills Indian Community, the Sault Tribe, the Little River Band, the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians and the Grand Traverse Band.

All five tribes will be empowered to create their own regulations. Three currently have regulations. Two others will be developing them.

On the Net:

Michigan Department of Natural Resources:
http://www.michigan.gov/dnr



Key provisions of consent decree on Indian treaty rights
By The Associated Press

Key provisions of the consent decree between the state of Michigan and five Indian tribes:

–Recognizes tribes’ hunting, fishing, gathering rights under 1836 treaty with U.S. government.

–Covers about 13.9 million acres of land and inland waters in western and northern Lower Peninsula, eastern Upper Peninsula.

–Tribes write their own rules and issue licenses under terms of the settlement.

–Treaty rights for subsistence harvests only, not commercial activity.

–No tribal access to private property without owner permission, unless already open to public.

–No gill netting, fish snagging on inland lakes or streams.

–Limited tribal spear fishing allowed.

–Establishes procedures for dispute resolution.

 

Key dates in battle over Indian hunting, fishing rights
By the Associated Press

Key dates in the battle over Indian hunting and fishing rights in Michigan:

1836: Treaty of Washington between Ottawa and Chippewa bands and the United States. Tribes cede ownership of about 13.9 million acres in northern Lower Peninsula, eastern Upper Peninsula.

1930: Michigan Supreme Court rules no Indian fishing rights exist under previous treaties.

1971: Court reverses itself, saying Bay Mills Indian Community has treaty fishing rights.

1973: Federal government files suit, seeking state recognition of tribal fishing rights.

1985: Consent decree reached, setting tribal and non-tribal fishing zones in portions of Lakes Michigan, Huron and Superior.

2000: Updated version of consent decree approved.

2003: Michigan asks court to rule that tribal fishing rights on inland waters and 1836 treaty lands have expired.

Sept. 26, 2007:
State, tribes announce settlement of inland rights case.
0
0
0